Did you know that your version of Internet Explorer is out of date?
To get the best possible experience using our website we recommend downloading one of the browsers below.

Internet Explorer 10, Firefox, Chrome, or Safari.

Evaluation Criteria

Summary
Full Set of Criteria

 

Summary

The evaluation process at all stages of the Relief Line Project Assessment will use the evaluation framework developed as part of the review of the City’s Official Plan transportation policies (“Feeling Congested?”). The evaluation framework captures the many aspects of city-building, all of which are important to the future of Toronto.

Schematic illustration of the four step evaluation process

 

Each of the potential station areas will be assessed on their ability to meet citybuilding criteria. The assessment will also consider input received as part of the public and stakeholder consultation process.

The evaluation criteria are based on principles and criteria developed during the Official Plan Review process “Feeling Congested?”

 

Serving people

 

Choice

Choice 

Develop an integrated network that connects different modes to provide for more travel options

  • Ease of transfer between existing transit services (e.g. streetcars, buses) the new Relief Line
  • Ability for pedestrians and cyclists to easily access stations
  • Ability to provide connections to other proposed transit lines (e.g. SmartTrack, Regional Express Rail, East Bayfront LRT, Broadview Streetcar Extension)

 

Experience

Experience

Capacity to ease crowding/congestion; reduce travel times; make travel more reliable, safe and enjoyable

  • Ability of potential station areas to serve key destinations (e.g. hospitals, major employment centres, transit hubs, major attractions, major commercial, colleges and universities)

 

 

Social Equity

Social Equity

Do not favour any group over others; allow everyone good access to work, school, and other activities 

  • Enhancing transit service to Neighbourhood Improvement Areas
  • Ability to create opportunities for encouraging new investment in Neighbourhood Improvement Areas
  • Gender equity considerations

 

 

strengthening places 

  

Shaping the City

Shaping the City

Use the transportation network as a tool to shape the residential development of the city

  • Support for vision, goals and objectives of the City’s Official Plan
  • Ability to serve areas of planned growth
  • Physical barriers that may limit the potential of the station area, including opportunities for transit oriented development
  • Ability to provide connections to other proposed transit lines (e.g. SmartTrack, Regional Express Rail, East Bayfront LRT, Broadview Streetcar Extension)

 

Healthy Neighbourhoods

Healthy Neighbourhoods 

Changes in the transportation network should strengthen & enhance existing neighbourhoods; promote safe walking & cycling

  • Potential impacts on existing neighbourhoods
  • Ability to improve access to schools, places of worship and community services
  • Potential impacts on cultural/heritage or archaeological features

 

 

Public Health & the Environment

Public Health and Environment

Support and enhance natural areas, encourage people to reduce how far they drive

  • Ability to create opportunities for improvement to the natural environment
  • Potential for temporary or permanent impacts on natural features and systems
  • Ability to create opportunities for encouraging new investment in Neighbourhood Improvement Areas
  • Ability to create opportunities to enhance parks and public spaces
  • Potential for temporary or permanent impacts to existing parks

 

 

 

supporting prosperity

 

Supports Growth

Supports Growth

Improvement in public transportation should support economic development; allow workers to get to jobs more easily; allow goods to get to markets more efficiently

  • Ability to connect to employment areas
  • Ability for the potential station to serve areas of new, planned and proposed commercial and employment development
  • Ability to support existing local businesses and industry by improving access
  • Potential for temporary or permanent impacts on businesses

 

Affordability

Affordability 

Improvements to the transportation system should be affordable to build, maintain and operate

  • Construction costs and challenges
  • Potential conflicts with existing utilities
  • Property impacts

 

 

Other Considerations for Bloor-Danforth Stations 

  • Ability to extend the Relief Line northward to Eglinton Avenue in future phases
  • Directness of the connection to the Bloor/Danforth Subway Line
  • Level of congestion relief for the Yonge Subway Line and Bloor-Yonge Station
  • Constructability
  • Ease of connection to existing maintenance and storage facility 
  • Potential for disruption to existing service on the Bloor-Danforth Subway

 

Other Considerations for Downtown Stations

  • Ability to connect with the PATH network
  • Ability to reduce pedestrian crowding at existing subway stations and at street level
  • Ability to extend the Relief Line westward in future phases
  • Constructability
  • Ability to connect to existing and planned bus and streetcar routes
  • Potential for disruption to existing service on the Yonge-University subway line

 

Full Evaluation Process and Criteria